Whole Genome Duplications during Vertebrate History (2R)

To explain the genetic basis of major transitions in organismal evolution, in 1970 Susumu Ohno famously proposed that multiple rounds of whole genome duplications (2R hypothesis) had occurred during the early history of vertebrate lineage, driving the evolution of developmental and morphological complexity in vertebrates (Ohno, 1970, 1973). Ohno’s idea was based solely on genome size differences, chromosomal topologies, and recent tetraploidization events in some fish and amphibians. Over the past decade the 2R hypothesis has gained extensive popularity among evolutionary and developmental biologist (Figure 1).


Proponents presented several lines of evidence in favor of entire genome duplication hypothesis in the early vertebrates. First, compared to model invertebrate genomes (fruit fly, nematode, sea squirt and amphioxus) the typical vertebrate genome possess more genes (Sidow, 1996). Second, the existence of paralogons in the human genome (Dehal and Boore, 2005; Lundin et al., 2003). Third, the conservation of gene synteny throughout vertebrates and their invertebrate ancestors and the spread of these anciently conserved syntenic fragments among multiple vertebrate chromosomes (vertebrate paralogons)(Hufton et al., 2008; Putnam et al., 2008). Fourth, the refinement of extensive gene duplication events early in vertebrate history through molecular-clock based approaches (absolute dating) (Panopoulou et al., 2003; Vandepoele et al., 2004). Fifth, the extrapolation of genome evolution scenarios in plant and yeast to genome evolution events in vertebrates (Bowers et al., 2003; Kellis et al., 2004; Panopoulou and Poustka, 2005). A further piece of evidence in favor of two rounds of whole genome duplication hypothesis emerges from the observation that protostome invertebrates (fruit fly) and deuterostome cephalochordate amphioxus possess single HOX cluster whereas the vertebrates have four or more clusters (Amores et al., 2004; Garcia-Fernàndez and Holland, 1994; Pollard and Holland, 2000).


Opponents of the 2R hypothesis argued that the current data is not compelling evidence of polyploidization and increase in the number of paralogous genes in vertebrates occurred as a result of small scale gene duplication events involving single genes and chromosomal segments, scattered at different times during the history of life (Abbasi and Grzeschik, 2007; Cotton and Page, 2006; Friedman and Hughes, 2004; Hughes, 1999; Hughes and Friedman, 2003). 


 


Figure 1: Proposed time points for vertebrate whole genome duplications. 


Useful references:


Abbasi, A.A., Grzeschik, K.-H., (2007) An insight into the phylogenetic history of hox linked gene families in vertebrates. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7, 239.

Amores, A., Suzuki, T., Yan, Y.-L., Pomeroy, J., Singer, A., Amemiya, C., Postlethwait, J.H., (2004) Developmental roles of pufferfish hox clusters and genome evolution in ray-fin fish. Genome Research, 14, 1-10.

Bowers, J.E., Chapman, B.A., Rong, J., Paterson, A.H., (2003) Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature, 422, 433-438.

Cotton, J.A., Page, R.D., (2006) The shape of human gene family phylogenies. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 6, 66.

Dehal, P., Boore, J.L., (2005) Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS biology, 3, 1700.

Friedman, R., Hughes, A.L., (2004) Two patterns of genome organization in mammals: The chromosomal distribution of duplicate genes in human and mouse. Molecular Biology and Evolution ,21, 1008-1013.

Garcia-Fernàndez, J., Holland, P.W., (1994) Archetypal organization of the amphioxus hox gene cluster. Nature, 370, 563-566.

Hufton, A.L., Groth, D., Vingron, M., Lehrach, H., Poustka, A.J., Panopoulou, G., (2008) Early vertebrate whole genome duplications were predated by a period of intense genome rearrangement. Genome Research.

Hughes, A.L., (1999) Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history. Journal of molecular evolution, 48, 565-576.

Hughes, A.L., Friedman, R., (2003) 2r or not 2r: Testing hypotheses of genome duplication in early vertebrates. Journal of structural and functional genomics, 3, 85-93.

Kellis, M., Birren, B.W., Lander, E.S., (2004) Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 428, 617-624.

Lundin, L. G., Larhammar, D., & Hallböök, F. (2003) Numerous groups of chromosomal regional paralogies strongly indicate two genome doublings at the root of the vertebrates. In Genome Evolution, (pp. 53-63). Springer Netherlands.

Ohno, S., (1970) Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Ohno, S., (1973) Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents. Nature, 244, 259-262.

Panopoulou, G., Hennig, S., Groth, D., Krause, A., Poustka, A.J., Herwig, R., Vingron, M., Lehrach, H., (2003) New evidence for genome-wide duplications at the origin of vertebrates using an amphioxus gene set and completed animal genomes. Genome Research, 13, 1056-1066.

Panopoulou, G., Poustka, A.J., (2005) Timing and mechanism of ancient vertebrate genome duplications–the adventure of a hypothesis. Trends in Genetics, 21, 559-567.

Pollard, S.L., Holland, P.W., (2000) Evidence for 14 homeobox gene clusters in human genome ancestry. Current Biology, 10, 1059-1062.

Putnam, N.H., Butts, T., Ferrier, D.E., Furlong, R.F., Hellsten, U., Kawashima, T., Robinson-Rechavi, M., Shoguchi, E., Terry, A., Yu, J.-K., (2008) The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature, 453, 1064-1071.

Sidow, A., (1996) Gen (om) e duplications in the evolution of early vertebrates. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 6, 715-722.

Vandepoele, K., De Vos, W., Taylor, J.S., Meyer, A., Van de Peer, Y., (2004) Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: Paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 1638-1643.